Cases 61 - 70 of 12,548
Rudder v. Price et al
as 2:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lea Rudder
Defendant:
Sherri Price, Connie Price, Glen Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05423
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ronald Frazier
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCre Incorporated, Michael Balderrama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudder v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv05418
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lea Rudder
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Brandon Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza-Gomez v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Francisco Mendoza-Gomez
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hunter v. Maneses et al
as 3:2024cv05267
Plaintiff:
Darrick L Hunter
Defendant:
Jilma Maneses, David Flynn, Cheryl Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowley v. Barron
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
Ryan Rowley
Respondent:
R Caternolo and Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Butsch v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Clayton E Butsch
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Beckham v. Danay et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Rashad Beckham
Defendant:
Danay, Allison, Carli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Inslee et al
as 3:2024cv05417
Plaintiff:
Ryan S Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Robert Ferguson and Jennifer Rheaume
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reavis v. Spokane County Jail
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Blake M Reavis
Defendant:
Spokane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
