Cases 11 - 20 of 90,567
Johnson v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Roland Johnson
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
John Patterson
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCleland v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01464
Plaintiff:
James F McCleland, II
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Jeff Tamulevich and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anglin v. Kennard et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
John Anglin
Defendant:
Susan Kennard and Alex Demyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
Earl Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brake v. Chiricahua Community Health Centers Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Adam Brake
Defendant:
Chiricahua Community Health Centers Incorporated, Jonathan Melk and Darlene Melk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
King et al v. United States Small Business Administration et al
as 2:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Gary R King and Kathy E King
Defendant:
United States Small Business Administration and National Cooperative Bank I Incorporated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
