Cases 21 - 30 of 86,314
Farnam Street Financial, Inc. v. BioQ Pharma Incorporated
as 0:2024cv03689
Plaintiff:
Farnam Street Financial, Inc.
Defendant:
BioQ Pharma Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Engstrom v. NTT Data Services, Inc.
as 0:2024cv03696
Defendant:
NTT Data Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robin Engstrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Guldan v. DeJoy
as 0:2024cv03695
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy
Plaintiff:
Dennis Guldan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Burkhalter v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2024cv03690
Plaintiff:
Lorna Burkhalter
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jones v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 0:2024cv03694
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Seagate Technology LLC et al
as 0:2024cv03691
Defendant:
Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Technology (Netherlands) B.V. and others
Plaintiff:
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Ivers v. Sherburne County Jail
as 0:2024cv03698
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail
Plaintiff:
Robert Ivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coletti et al v. Change Healthcare, Inc.
as 0:2024cv03681
Plaintiff:
Claudia Egleston and Jason Coletti
Defendant:
Change Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
