Cases 71 - 80 of 68,783
Smith-Gordon v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv12410
Defendant:
Virginia M Ward, State of Massachusetts, Breanna M Burney and others
Plaintiff:
Torre J Smith-Gordon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Lubavitch of Cambridge, Inc. v. Cambridge Board of Zoning Appeal et al
as 1:2024cv12403
Defendant:
Cambridge Board of Zoning Appeal and City of Cambridge
Plaintiff:
Lubavitch of Cambridge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Degree v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2024cv12415
Defendant:
William Martir, City of Lowell, Joseph Borodawka and others
Plaintiff:
DeVante Degree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12408
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe v. Abraham
as 1:2024cv12407
Defendant:
Reginald Abraham
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hunter v. Auclair
as 3:2024cv30115
Plaintiff:
Pro se litigant Chase Carmen Hunter
Defendant:
Joanne Auclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11901
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv12350
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
