Cases 1 - 10 of 12,289
Acosta v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Justin Acosta
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hay v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Matthew Craig Hay
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
J.R. Simplot Company v. Kunz
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
J.R. Simplot Company
Defendant:
C. Keith Kunz
Estate of Robert Thomas Sequints et al v. Rivera, Jr. et al
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Estate of Robert Thomas Sequints, Xavier T Sequints, S.S. and others
Defendant:
Miguel Rivera, Jr., Idaho State Police, Steven Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foster et al v. Mulder et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Garrett Foster and Foster Five Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Myron Mulder, Cara Mulder, Harris Duininck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Newton v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Donald Newton
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Rodgers v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Daniel Edward Rodgers
Respondent:
Warden Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sacaquini et al v. V Haul Trucking Ltd, et al.
as 4:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Lian Sacaquini and Sarah Michelle Markov
Defendant:
V Haul Trucking Ltd and Baljat S Dhillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Venable v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Ashley A. Venable
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
