Cases 101 - 110 of 94,468
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vines v. Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Clayton Vines
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Reaves
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections and David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. VA DOC et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
VA DOC, Kyle Rosch, Mack Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Williams
as 2:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kennedy
Defendant:
Cpl Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staab v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Tonya Pitt Staab
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2024cv01069
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter Rogatory
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hunt v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, ViaPath Technologies and Todd E Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
