Cases 41 - 50 of 107,790
McCray v. Township of Eatonville Florida et al
as 6:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Adrienne D McCray
Defendant:
Broderick Lampkin, Township of Eatonville Florida and Stanley Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hillman v. Remain at Home Senior Care
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Lavaneicer Hillman
Defendant:
Remain at Home Senior Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barred Business et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv02744
Plaintiff:
Barred Business, John Cole Vodicka and Steven Williams
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Christopher M. Carr, Keith E. Gammage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
OBIAGWU v. BALDWIN MEMORIAL CREMATORY et al
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
ERNEST OBIAGWU
Defendant:
BALDWIN MEMORIAL CREMATORY, MOORES FUNERAL HOME AND CREMATORY and STEWART COUEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
