Cases 81 - 90 of 10,938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pinto v. Visconti
as 1:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Albert Gregory Pinto
Defendant:
Maha Visconti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
David v. Virginia Employment Commissioner
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Jeanette D. David
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Butler v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Constance A. Butler
Defendant:
Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority and Steven Nesmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Graman et al v. City of Suffolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Megan Kelly Graman, Laura Ashley Callis, Alissa Kiera Etters and others
Defendant:
Suffolk, Alfred S. Chandler and Casey Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
