Civil Rights Cases filed in Rhode Island
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,020
Acosta v. Crossroads
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: Robert Acosta
Defendant: Crossroads and Tristel Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff: Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Defendant: Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amesbury v. Manning et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff: Brian P. Amesbury
Defendant: Paul Manning, James Given, Hannah Burnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenney v. Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission and Kimberly Ahearn, in her Official Capacity
as 1:2024cv00252
Plaintiff: John Kenney
Defendant: Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission and Kimberly Ahearn, in her Official Capacity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00247
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brum v. Town of Bristol et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Michael Brum
Defendant: Town of Bristol, Bristol Police Department, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?