Cases 21 - 30 of 53,320
Taco Tune, Inc. et al v. Blackjack$ Lounge, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Taco Tune, Inc., Bleu Disque Music, Co., Inc., 'Til Tunes Associates and others
Defendant:
Blackjack$ Lounge, Inc. and Soncha Dowding
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Roach v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Tracy Roach
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanz-Carver v. Oklahoma County District Court
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Kyle Sanz-Carver
Respondent:
Oklahoma County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutton v. McClendon
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Joshua Lamont Sutton
Respondent:
Frankie McClendon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. Sheriff of Canadian County et al
as 5:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Laura Neal
Defendant:
Sheriff of Canadian County, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Ave Giovinco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00646
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Nicois Megale Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. Cole
as 5:2024cv00647
Petitioner:
James Jackson
Respondent:
David Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
