Cases 11 - 20 of 5,416
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11400
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11401
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11389
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Echosens SA v. E-Scopics S.A.S.
as 1:2024cv11373
Plaintiff:
Echosens SA
Defendant:
E-Scopics S.A.S.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Viken Detection Corporation v. Videray Technologies, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv11375
Plaintiff:
Viken Detection Corporation
Defendant:
Videray Technologies, Inc. and Paul E. Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Megamen Moving & Storage, LLC v. Mega Man Moving LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10805
Plaintiff:
Megamen Moving & Storage, LLC
Defendant:
Mega Man Moving LLC and Anthony Coviello
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ZipBy USA LLC, et al v. Parzych
as 24-1500
Plaintiff:
ZIPBY USA LLC, TMA GROUP OF COMPANIES LIMITED and TMA CAPITAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Defendant:
GREGORY PARZYCH
Interested Party:
JENNIFER PROKOWIEW
Creative Photographers, Inc. v. BR Brow + Beauty, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11371
Plaintiff:
Creative Photographers, Inc.
Defendant:
BR Brow + Beauty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 1:2024cv11363
Plaintiff:
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
E.R. Enterprises, LLC v. Savr Restaurant LLC
as 1:2024cv11348
Plaintiff:
E.R Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Savr Restaurant LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
