Cases 71 - 80 of 2,104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taite v. Clarke County Alabama District Attorneys Prosecutors et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Marcus O. Taite
Defendant:
Clarke County Alabama District Attorneys Prosecutors, Insurance Providers, Officials State Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Brouillette v. Mobile County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
John Michael Brouillette, Sr.
Defendant:
Mobile County District Attorney's Office, Ashley Rich, Keith Blackwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Phillips v. City of Satsuma et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Phillips
Defendant:
City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, Clint Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carter v. Mobile County Public School System
as 1:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Darvis L. Carter
Defendant:
Mobile County Public School System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
