Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 81 - 90 of 86,805
Michael Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11482
Petitioner: MICHAEL HENDERSON
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Cody Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11522
Petitioner: CODY EDWARD DAVIS
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dai-Juan Taylor v. Fulton County District Attorney, et al
as 24-11513
Plaintiff: DAI-JUAN TAIKAIN TAYLOR
Defendant: FULTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, POLICE CHIEF OF FAIRBURN, GA, FAIRBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Johnathan Wheeler v. Joe Williams, et al
as 24-11520
Plaintiff: JOHNATHAN ALLEN WHEELER
Defendant: JOE WILLIAMS, GREGORY DAVIS, DEREK CLUPPER and others
Luis Rodriguez, et al v. Imperial Brands, PLC., et al
as 24-11487
Plaintiff: LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, MARIA RODRIGUEZ, ALFREDO RAMON FORNS and others
Defendant: IMPERIAL BRANDS, PLC., CORPORACION HABANOS, S.A., WPP, PLC. and others
Florida East Coast Holdings Corporation v. Lexington Insurance Company, et al
as 24-11479
Plaintiff: FLORIDA EAST COAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Defendant: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY and others
Type: Contract Insurance
USA v. Jose Acosta-Pinedo
as 24-11465
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOSE ANTONIO ACOSTA-PINEDO
Matthew Tassin v. USA
as 24-11467
Petitioner: MATTHEW TASSIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amy Doherty-Heinze v. Michael T. Chrisley
as 24-11505
Plaintiff: AMY DOHERTY-HEINZE
Defendant: MICHAEL TODD CHRISLEY
Caryn Yost-Rudge, et al v. The City of Stuart, et al
as 24-11481
Plaintiff: CARYN HALL YOST-RUDGE and WILLIAM JOHN RUDGE, IV
Defendant: THE CITY OF STUART, A TO Z PROPERTIES, INC, PAUL J. NICOLETTI and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?