Cases 21 - 30 of 26,777
DOE 5 et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00319
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 5, JANE DOE 5 and MINOR DOE 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
RADI v. EIDSON et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Defendant:
HOWARD MCCLAIN, PATRICK EIDSON and MATTHEW S RADI
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
BLAKELY v. USA
as 7:2024cv00092
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL M BLAKELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RADI v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY COURTHOUSE
as 1:2024cv00141
Respondent:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Petitioner:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PUGH v. WALKER
as 5:2024cv00321
Defendant:
WARDEN HERBERT WALKER, III
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LENARD PUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLAYTON v. KEMP et al
as 5:2024cv00320
Defendant:
JEFFERY, DIRECTOR HATCHER, CO CLAYTON and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PUGH v. WALKER
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LENARD PUGH
Defendant:
WARDEN HERBERT WALKER, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KNIGHT v. WILLIAMS
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHANE KNIGHT
Defendant:
SHERIFF JOHN Q WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. GEORGIA BANKERS ASSOCIATION INSURANCE TRUST INC et al
as 5:2024cv00317
Defendant:
GEORGIA BANKERS ASSOCIATION INSURANCE TRUST INC and BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEALTHCARE OF GEORGIA INC
Plaintiff:
LISA PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
ELNOUR v. USA
as 3:2024cv00094
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MOHAMED ELNOUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
