Cases 131 - 140 of 2,505
Edwards v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv08041
Petitioner:
Kevin Kentrell Edwards
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Woods v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv08040
Petitioner:
Jehudijah Uzziel Woods
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sims v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv08039
Petitioner:
Jumar Sims
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chevis v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv08038
Petitioner:
Dontae Larun Chevis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dennard v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Virgil Dennard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Blancher v. USA
as 1:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Blancher
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richards v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Legestin Richards
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Goodman v. USA
as 1:2022cv00442
Petitioner:
Ryan Cody Goodman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kailing v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv08037
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Kailing
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Grubbs v. United States of America (INMATE 2)
as 1:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Grubbs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
