General Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 56,266
Adkins v. Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institution
as 8:2024cv01125
Petitioner: Alfonzo Damien Adkins
Respondent: Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cooper v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv01129
Petitioner: Jamell M. Cooper
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stoney Glenn v. State of Florida
as 24-11490
Petitioner: STONEY GLENN
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Moss v. McClain
as 5:2024cv00584
Petitioner: Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent: Warden Antonio McClain and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff: Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant: Joseph Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00461
Petitioner: Victor V. Reed
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. OLIVER
as 7:2024cv00046
Petitioner: MONALETA D ALLEN
Respondent: TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11472
Petitioner: RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Michael Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11482
Petitioner: MICHAEL HENDERSON
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Cody Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11522
Petitioner: CODY EDWARD DAVIS
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?