Cases 71 - 80 of 164,391
Carr v. McConnell
as 1:2024cv02766
Plaintiff:
Brandi Carr
Defendant:
Ian McConnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv02774
Plaintiff:
Jessica Martin, KGM and KRM
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department and Officer Willis Josephs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Alvarez-Hernandez v. United States
as 1:2024cv02771
Petitioner:
Rafael Alvarez-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Shockley v. Balkcom et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jacques Shockley
Defendant:
Det Stephen Balkcom, Chife Richard Pennington and Paul Howard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv02761
Plaintiff:
Juliette Moon
Defendant:
Wayne T. Williams, Sony Music Entertainment (SME) Epic Records, Sony/ATV Music Publishing and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
