Cases 81 - 90 of 47,871
Cavallo v. HPD Section 8 et al
as 1:2024cv04242
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Cavallo
Defendant:
HPD Section 8 and Goddard Riverside
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiang v. Ministry of Public Security of P.R. China et al
as 1:2024cv04022
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
Ministry of Public Security of P.R. China and Baise City Public Safety Bereau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ally Bank v. The City Of Rochester
as 6:2024cv06348
Plaintiff:
Ally Bank
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Treadwell et al
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Marc T. Treadwell, Charles H. Weigle, Sonja Profit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
V.S. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2024cv04199
Plaintiff:
V.S. and V.S. on behalf of her child E.S., a minor
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
PETITPHARE
as 1:2024cv03955
Plaintiff:
ROLAND PETITPHARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ally Bank v. The City Of Rochester
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ally Bank
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines et al v. Sirchrsy Systems et al
as 3:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
Telly Hines and Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Sirchrsy Systems, Charles Town Acts, Katrina Camera and others
Williams v. Leach et al
as 5:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Leach, Andrew Young and Micheal Merkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shibley et al v. Bixlerond et al
as 6:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Annamay Shibley and Christopher Wheeler, Sr.
Defendant:
Jennifer Bixlerond, Department of Social Services, Mohawk Valley Community Action Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
