Cases 61 - 70 of 76,918
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Employment and Re-Employment Rights of Members of Uniformed Services
SON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA. et al
as 2:2024cv04925
Defendant:
SEPTA TRANSPORTATION, PA., ESQ. GARY BROWNSTEIN, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA. and others
Plaintiff:
YONG CHUL SON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv01030
Defendant:
Officer R. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Casey v. GOMEZ et al
as 2:2024cv09169
Defendant:
P.O. JOSE M. GOMEZ and WILLIAM KRAPF
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jeffrey L Casey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASEY, JR. v. GOMEZ et al
as 3:2024cv09169
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-5), POLICE OFFICER JOSE M. GOMEZ and POLICE OFFICER WILLIAM KRAPF
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. CASEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv09168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
