Cases 131 - 140 of 8,698
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Butler v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Constance A. Butler
Defendant:
Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority and Steven Nesmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lisle v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Loreen L. Lisle
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III and Frank D. Whitworth, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disability (Public Accommodations)
Washington Jr. v. Stafford County Sheriffs Office
as 1:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Randull K. Washington Jr.
Defendant:
Stafford County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington, Jr. v. SMK Law Group
as 1:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Randull K. Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
SMK Law Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
