Cases 41 - 50 of 566,636
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Fogel v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brian Fogel
Defendant:
Major T. Hall, Warden Jeffrey Artrip, Assistant Warden J.H. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Curtis Leroy Floyd
Defendant:
Happy Smith, Rick White, P. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. VADOC Publication Review Committee
as 7:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
VADOC Publication Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Deonta J. Hicks
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, David Anderson, Joseph D. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Johnson et al
as 7:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Craig Johnson and Sgt. E.C. Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad Bryant v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Al-Akhir Islam Muhammad Bryant
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stutler v. Tate
as 5:2024cv00103
Petitioner:
Aric Jason Stutler
Respondent:
Ditmaus Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
