Cases 51 - 60 of 77,333
White v. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated et al
as 1:2024cv01761
Plaintiff:
Louise M. White
Defendant:
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated and Teledyne FLIR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 jb Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Prokos v. DMV Solutions, L.L.C
as 1:2024cv01756
Plaintiff:
Andrew Prokos
Defendant:
DMV Solutions, L.L.C
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Bailey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Charles Andre Bailey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Xu et al v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2024cv01753
Plaintiff:
Shenning Xu and Andrew Liu
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Prokos v. DMV Solutions
as 8:2024cv01755
Plaintiff:
Andrew Prokos
Defendant:
DMV Solutions
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Beverage v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01752
Plaintiff:
Tina Beverage
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vaughn et al v. Jack L. Marcus Inc
as 1:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
Donald D Vaughn, Paul Martin and Charles Tucker
Defendant:
Jack L. Marcus Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
