Cases 31 - 40 of 158,048
Gonzalez #967783 v. Mukarurinda
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gonzalez #967783
Defendant:
Leoncie Mukarurinda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #509365 v. Forshythe et al
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Antoine Ronald Williams #509365
Defendant:
Unknown Forshythe and Unknown Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer #769438 v. Hudtari et al
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mathew Mercer #769438
Defendant:
Uknown Hudtari and Unknown Lakaden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor #940436 v. Bush et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Davariol Marquavis Taylor #940436
Defendant:
Unknown Bush, Branda James, Unknown Hares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodibaugh v. Lake Michigan Contracting LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Sara Rodibaugh
Defendant:
Lake Michigan Contracting LLC and Daniel Vanderhyde
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pierce v. Snow et al
as 2:2024cv11642
Plaintiff:
Perry Pierce
Defendant:
Snow, D. Baker and Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rolling #91508-509 v. Wren
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Redo L. Rolling #91508-509
Defendant:
Christopher Wren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albers #15580-040 v. United States
as 1:2024cv00649
Petitioner:
David Scott Albers #15580-040
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Martin #857172 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Jawon M. Martin #857172
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, John Davids, Unknown Bonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
