Cases 1 - 10 of 31,543
Teeple v. Village of Skokie, Illinois
as 1:2024cv05332
Plaintiff:
Ronald Teeple
Defendant:
Village of Skokie, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kelly v. Guevara et al
as 1:2024cv05354
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelly
Defendant:
Reynaldo Guevara, Geri Lynn Yanow, Hector Vergara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King-Banks, Melissa v. Mandell, Kenneth et al
as 3:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sue King-Banks
Defendant:
Kenneth Mandell, David Mandell, David Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. A safe place
as 1:2024cv05257
Plaintiff:
Latasha Love
Defendant:
A safe place
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hitch v. McLean County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hitch
Defendant:
McLean County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Ambers v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Michael E Ambers
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County, Tippecanoe County Sheriff, Jared Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTSON v. DORA
as 1:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
JEROME DERRELL ROBERTSON
Defendant:
DORA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGH v. COUNTY OF HENDRICKS, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
KEVIN C. SINGH
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HENDRICKS, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Banner v. Dupage County Courthouse
as 1:2024cv05248
Plaintiff:
David O'Banner
Defendant:
Dupage County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
RADCLIFFE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
TERRIS RADCLIFFE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JOEL THACKER, TYLER EVAN BURGAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
