Cases 11 - 20 of 5,425
Ruelas v. Benton County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv05130
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Benton County Jail and Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. Harper
as 5:2024cv05128
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Chief of Police Cody Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. Best
as 5:2024cv05129
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Chief of Police Jonathan Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. McSlone (#118) et al
as 6:2024cv06061
Plaintiff:
Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer McSlone (#118), Officer Ramirez (#171), Officer Gibson (#105) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nielson v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Howard Dale Nielson
Defendant:
Captain Tracey Smith, Jail Administrator Gina Butler, Sheriff Bobby Walraven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts and Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Knight
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Jessie Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
District Judge Jack Barker, Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips, Sheriff Ricky Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Routh v. Johson
as 2:2024cv02079
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Routh, Jr.
Respondent:
Judge Christine Johson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
