Cases 11 - 20 of 5,425
Pratt v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts and Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Knight
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Jessie Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. Benton County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv05130
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Benton County Jail and Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. Harper
as 5:2024cv05128
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Chief of Police Cody Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. Best
as 5:2024cv05129
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Chief of Police Jonathan Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Routh v. Johson
as 2:2024cv02079
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Routh, Jr.
Respondent:
Judge Christine Johson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2024cv04064
Plaintiff:
Randy Ellis Williams
Defendant:
Jason Mitchell and Public Defender John Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Crawford County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02077
Petitioner:
Eureka R. Barnes
Respondent:
Crawford County Sheriff's Office, Jason Cooper and Kevin Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estes v. Tabor et al
as 2:2024cv02076
Plaintiff:
Shaun Jermaine Estes
Defendant:
Judge Stephen Tabor, Court CLerk Susie Hassett, Prosecutor Daniel Shue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Tabor
as 2:2024cv02073
Petitioner:
Shaun Jermaine Estes
Respondent:
Judge Stephen Tabor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
