Cases 141 - 150 of 95,853
Schnur v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mia Schnur
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ewing v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Ewing
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fields v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Charitine Chante Fields
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Whittaker v. Owens et al
as 4:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Robert Whittaker
Defendant:
Dr. Shannon K. Owens, Dale Glass, Unknown Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moser et al v. Club Car Wash Operating, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
David Moser and Richard Adams
Defendant:
Club Car Wash Operating, LLC, Roland Bartels and Roland S. Bartels
Florence v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Matthew Florence
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nevels v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Miranda Nevels
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gilmore v. City of Cape Girardeau et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Gilmore
Defendant:
City of Cape Girardeau, Wes Blair, Mark Welker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Jasleen Enterprises LLC
as 4:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Pratt
Defendant:
Jasleen Enterprises LLC d/b/a Vapor Maven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
