Cases 121 - 130 of 278,360
Navarro Zuniga v. Garland
as 24-3775
Petitioner:
NERLIN OMAR NAVARRO ZUNIGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Butel, et al. v. Marathon Refining Logistics Services, LLC
as 24-3787
Respondent:
LOUIS BUTEL and PAM MOCHERNIAK, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees
Petitioner:
MARATHON REFINING LOGISTICS SERVICES, LLC
Western Watersheds Project et al v. Williams et al
as 9:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project, International Wildlife Coexistence Network, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant:
Martha Williams, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
United States of America et al v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09368
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Nicole v. T2M Investments, LLC
as 1:2024cv00562
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Beal v. Gritstone bio, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03640
Plaintiff:
Tammy Beal
Defendant:
Gritstone bio, Inc., Andrew R. Allen and Vassiliki Economides
United States v. Adobe, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv03630
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Adobe, Inc., Maninder Sawhney and David Wadhwani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Diana Stinnett v. TaxReliefCenter.ORG, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv05084
Plaintiff:
Diana Stinnett
Defendant:
TaxReliefCenter.ORG, Inc. and Does 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Singleton v. City of Hope
as 2:2024cv05115
Plaintiff:
Jason Singleton
Defendant:
City of Hope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
