Cases 81 - 90 of 24,451
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01209
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Onwuameze
as 3:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
Obiora Onwuameze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasso v. Little et al
as 4:2024cv04101
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Jasso
Defendant:
Roy Little, Alexander Stuart, Jamar A Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox o/b/o J.L.M, a minor v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02127
Plaintiff:
Karen Cox o/b/o J.L.M, a minor
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Washington Sr. v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv04065
Plaintiff:
Mario Devonne Washington Sr.
Defendant:
Nathan Lewis, Kyle Winbigler, Kevin Legate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Parham v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Marion Parham
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakey v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Carroll Blakey
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, Tiffany Clark, Kellie Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wolfe et al
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Julie Moore Wolfe, City of Decatur Illinois, Jim Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lofthouse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lofthouse
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
