Cases 71 - 80 of 41,082
Robbins v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Steven J Robbins and Steven Joseph Robbins, SR
Defendant:
Sue Jones, Nurse, Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Jr v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Percy Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robbins v. Dept of Corr et al
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Steven J Robbins and Steven Joseph Robbins
Defendant:
Dept of Corr, Jerry Preshon, Thomas Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheetz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Ronnie R Sheetz
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Krysta M. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Davis v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Lyndon C Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkland v. Ombudsman Bureau et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Defendant:
Centuerion Health, Charlene A Burkett, English and others
Plaintiff:
Martize Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Myles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
John B Myles
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
John B Myles
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
