Cases 81 - 90 of 19,711
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv01513
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEP'T OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2024cv01514
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPERATION, SAFE SERVE CORPERATION and INDIANA DEP'T OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIDGEWATERS v. HALE et al
as 1:2024cv01515
Defendant:
BOLAJI OJO, BARBARA IYAMU, RHONDALYN HARTMAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BLAKE BRIDGEWATERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLLIDAY v. WELLS et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
TERRYON GOLLIDAY
Defendant:
WELLS, TROUTMAN, STEPHANIE EDWARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. WADDAS
as 2:2024cv00428
Petitioner:
SHANE LOUIS PETERSON
Respondent:
J. WADDAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MOORE v. HOUSE et al
as 1:2024cv01482
Defendant:
VELEZ, KMERTS, YANCY and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TISHNER v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv01481
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TISHNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENNINGS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01483
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, STATE OF INDIANA and U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
JOSEF JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Defendant:
A. MOSELEY, D. BEDWELL, JAMES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00426
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, MATTHEW LEOHR, JACQUELYNNE PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
DION JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
