Cases 41 - 50 of 21,648
Zeno v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Edgar Zeno
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Roach v. Harold
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Donaven D. Roach
Defendant:
Unknown Harold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Center for Innovations in Evaluative Medicine, LLC et al v. Becerra
as 3:2024cv00362
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Claimant:
Center for Innovations in Evaluative Medicine, LLC d/b/a Warner Orthopedics and Wellness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Morgan v. Oglesbee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
John Morgan
Defendant:
Judge Jeffery Oglesbee and Feliciana Lopez Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Arceneaux v. Great Northern Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Darin Arceneaux
Defendant:
Great Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America v. Pryer
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nathan Pryer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Promissory Note
CSRS, LLC et al v. Element 25 Limited
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
CSRS, LLC and Fides Consulting, LLC
Defendant:
Element 25 Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Magee v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Petitioner:
Covonta Magee
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carroll v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Tamara Carroll
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
