Cases 61 - 70 of 126,355
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Sam Enterprise, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv12418
Defendant:
Sam Enterprise, LLC and Sukhwinder S. Singh
Plaintiff:
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. and LC Trademarks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Waseen et al v. Washtenaw County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv12419
Defendant:
Trent Anthony Simms, Washtenaw, County of and Washtenaw County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Talal Waseen, Waseem Ahmed and Misbah Imtiaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
sconiers v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv12425
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Henry Fenrick and Gus Harrison Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
catonya sconiers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Congdon Property Holding Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv12421
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Scott
Defendant:
Congdon Property Holding Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv12413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jones v. Douglas
as 4:2024cv12422
Petitioner:
Dexter Carl Jones
Respondent:
Adam Douglas
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cunningham v. Cargol
as 5:2024cv12415
Respondent:
Kim Cargol
Petitioner:
Todd William Cunningham
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
