Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Cases 41 - 50 of 51,131
Radley v. Ascension Health
as 4:2024cv00748
Plaintiff: Jill Radley
Defendant: Ascension Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tokarz v. Teja et al
as 4:2024cv00749
Plaintiff: Grzegorz Tokarz
Defendant: Amarjit Teja, Forever Logistic Inc. and Forever Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Allen v. USA
as 4:2024cv00751
Petitioner: Justin Clifford Allen
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tokarz v. Teja et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Grzegorz Tokarz
Defendant: Amarjit Teja, Forever Logistic Inc. and Forever Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Davis v. USA
as 4:2024cv00754
Petitioner: Quintin Davis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00752
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bruder v. Wilcac Life Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00744
Plaintiff: Patsy Bruder
Defendant: Wilcac Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Sanford v. The 3M Company et al
as 4:2024cv00741
Defendant: The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Steven Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bong et al v. Bellaho Investment Corp et al
as 4:2024cv00742
Plaintiff: Cody Bong and Hung Nguyen
Defendant: Bellaho Investment Corp., Viet Ho and Linh Duong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?