Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 20,726
BAUR v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Petitioner: BRIAN D. BAUR
Respondent: TOM MCGINLEY, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICE v. KARASTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant: C/O KARASTON, C/O MANTUCE, C/O ANTWON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN v. RICARD
as 2:2024cv02485
Petitioner: ANDRE VAN
Respondent: WARDEN RICARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TAYLOR v. CO 1 DUNSTON et al
as 2:2024cv02424
Plaintiff: WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant: CO 1 DUNSTON and THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAGE v. PRIORE et al
as 2:2024cv02462
Plaintiff: KYLE PAGE
Defendant: CHIEF PATRICK PRIORE, BRIAN VITKO, HOME DEPOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FATA
as 5:2024cv02402
Not Yet Classified: ABRAHIM FATA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: JERRELL ROBINSON
as 2:2024cv01509
Plaintiff: JERRELL ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv02391
Petitioner: STEVEN MILLER
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NASH v. PHILA DISTRICT ATTY et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff: AASIM NASH
Defendant: PHILA DISTRICT ATTY, PHILA PUB. DEF. and NEW VITAE DR. BEHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIOTT v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv02426
Plaintiff: JAMIE ELLIOTT
Defendant: RANITA DAVIS, KIM DAVIS, MICHAEL SEADOG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?