Cases 11 - 20 of 10,986
Mock v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Brian Ray Mock
Respondent:
Warden James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Grady Perry, James Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Fast Access Correctional Health Care
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Wright
Defendant:
Fast Access Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00714
Petitioner:
Calvin Starks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Robertson v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewan Robertson
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Core Civic, Damon Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lineberry et al
as 3:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Amber Lineberry and Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathews v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Courtney B. Mathews
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Core Civic, Damon Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Leah Joy Ward
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curran v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00691
Petitioner:
John F. Curran
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence v. Leeds
as 3:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
Terrance Lawrence
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
