Cases 101 - 110 of 31,723
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
James v. Aurora Health Care et al
as 2:2024cv01108
Defendant:
Aurora Health Care and Ernest P Luczowski
Plaintiff:
Larry M James
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hardy v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2024cv01107
Defendant:
Oscar Espita, State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services, City of Milwaukee and others
Plaintiff:
Torrey D Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adelsbach v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01106
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Melissa A Adelsbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Townsend v. Kijakazi
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Candice Marie Townsend
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lee et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01105
Defendant:
ABC Insurance Company and Walmart Inc
Plaintiff:
Genevieve Lee and Wisconsin Department of Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
House v. Racine County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2024cv01100
Defendant:
Christopher Schmaling and Racine County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trevino v. Boese et al
as 2:2024cv01102
Defendant:
Leslie Boese, John A Kopatich and Mario Lantigua
Plaintiff:
Armando Trevino, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
