Cases 11 - 20 of 2,122
Douse v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
James Nathaniel Douse
Defendant:
United States of America and Greylock McKinnon Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gibas v. Houghton
as 1:2024mc00008
Petitioner:
Susan Marie Gibas
Respondent:
Keith J. Houghton
Johnson v. U.S. Marine Corps et al
as 7:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Marine Corps and John - Jane Does 1 -50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wrenn v. Williamson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Simone Wrenn
Defendant:
Kiara Williamson, DaJour Jones, Deborah Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emiabata et al v. Warren
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Philip Emiabata and Sylvia Emiabata
Defendant:
David M. Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA v. PAGE et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE and ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kuluva et al v. Taylor
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
William Kuluva, Kastle Ventures, LLC and Sterling Gaming International, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Piaggio v. Puga
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Aldo Enrique Fausto Francsiscolo Piaggio
Defendant:
Claudia Maria Palacios Puga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 Intl Child Abduction Remedies Act
Morris v. NC Education Lottery et al
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Charles Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
NC Education Lottery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frannicola et al v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Arthur J Frannicola and Joy A Frannicola
Defendant:
Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and RRA 2 CP, LLC, Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and RRA 2 CP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
