Cases 71 - 80 of 1,156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hansen v. USA
as 1:2022cv00411
Petitioner:
Scott Kelly Hansen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Isom v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2022cv00374
Petitioner:
Reginald Isom and Reginald A. Eisom
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Joseph Freeman
Defendant:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bedford-Beaulieu v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2022cv00359
Petitioner:
Normand Bedford-Beaulieu
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atryzek v. RI Attorney General's Office et al
as 1:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Sebastian W. Atryzek
Defendant:
RI Attorney General's Office, RI Department of Corrections, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanco v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Efrain Blanco
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Patricia A. Coyne-Fague, RIDOC Employee John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valerio v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
William Valerio
Defendant:
Daniel Martin, Ron Lebonte, Jessica Dupont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staveley v. USA
as 1:2022cv00315
Petitioner:
David Staveley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meeker v. USA
as 1:2022cv00306
Petitioner:
Gregory Meeker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
