Cases 61 - 70 of 325
GORDON v. GORDON et al
as 2:2019cv20658
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GORDON
Defendant:
ERIC GORDON, 724 EAST ST. GEORGES AVENUE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and JACK KOLPEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLINS v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv20532
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANC OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS HOLLINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHAH v. LUXE ENERGY LLC et al
as 3:2019cv19580
Defendant:
GRAY SURFACE SPECIALITIES & CONSULTING LLC and LUXE ENERGY LLC
Plaintiff:
PETER SHAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. EDLESTON et al
as 3:2019cv19528
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARILYN J. EDLESTON and WILLIAM R. EDLESTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MENG v. DU
as 3:2019cv18118
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE MENG
Defendant:
PU DU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEPT LINCOLN CROSSING, LLC v. TOWERS ASSOCIATES, LTD.
as 2:2019cv17639
Plaintiff:
MEPT LINCOLN CROSSING, LLC
Defendant:
TOWERS ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TIMM v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 3:2019cv17304
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, FREDDIE MAC, DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EIRC TIMM and BRIAN ERIC TIMM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHULMANN v. THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv14354
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF MONMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFF, MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, MONMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHULMANN
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
HAGER et al v. SELENE FINANCE LP et al
as 3:2019cv13650
Defendant:
SELENE FINANCE LP, DOES 1-10 and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Plaintiff:
DONALD HAGER and CARRIE HAGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
