Cases 31 - 40 of 191,245
SNEDEKER v. LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT et al
as 2:2024cv02169
Plaintiff:
MARYANNE SNEDEKER
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Banks v. FAMILY DOLLAR INC.
as 2:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Melissa Banks
Defendant:
FAMILY DOLLAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
BELLOMO v. BIG LOTS STORES, LLC
as 2:2024cv02165
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. BELLOMO
Defendant:
BIG LOTS STORES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rodriguez v. Mount Airy #1, L.L.C.
as 3:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Alida Rodriguez
Defendant:
Mount Airy #1 L.L.C. doing business as Mount Airy Casino Resort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morton v. ALDI Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01220
Plaintiff:
Leticia Morton
Defendant:
ALDI Inc and ALDI LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bonds v. Pilot Travel Centers LLC
as 3:2024cv01224
Plaintiff:
Clifford Bonds
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Goggans et al v. Wilhelmsen
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Dillon Goggans, Sara Goggans and R.L.G, a minor
Defendant:
Julie Marie Wilhelmsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hehl v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Hehl
Defendant:
Belk, Inc. and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MacCloskey v. Truist Bank et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Sean MacCloskey
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Safeguard Properties Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Foreman v. Dillon Companies, LLC
as 1:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
Mary Theresa Foreman
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, LLC a Kansas limited liability company doing business as King Soopers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
