Cases 1 - 10 of 7,322
H. v. Michigan City City of et al
as 3:2024cv00777
Defendant:
Maximiliano Hernandez, Michigan City City of and Kenneth Gaudron
Plaintiff:
A. H.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AYUB v. DEWAN
as 1:2024cv01635
Plaintiff:
AMIR AYUB
Defendant:
RAJESH DEWAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HOWELL v. BUILEE
as 1:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOWELL
Defendant:
HANH D. BUILEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ESTATE OF ASSON HACKER v EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ASSON HACKER
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SOUTHWEST INDIANA LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ACADEMY, GARRETT VANFLEET and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Southwest Indiana Law Enforcement Law Academy
as 1:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, SOUTHWEST INDIANA LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ACADEMY, GARRETT VANFLEET and others
Defendant:
KAURTNEY HACKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CODY v. HOLCOMB
as 1:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
CONTRELL CODY
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FIELDS, II v. SKINNER et al
as 1:2024cv01630
Defendant:
DAWN JOHNSON and TONY SKINNER
Plaintiff:
GREGORY P. FIELDS, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEAVER v. SKINNER et al
as 1:2024cv01633
Defendant:
DAWN JOHNSON and TONY SKINNER
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. CARMEL POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2024cv01603
Plaintiff:
Tyairz Glover
Defendant:
CARMEL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sams v. Aarons Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00322
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff, Joseph Kraus and Aarons Inc.
Plaintiff:
Niquita Sams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
