Cases 131 - 140 of 6,989
Fuqua v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08621
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yepa v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00547
Petitioner:
Gavin Yepa
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hollins v. Monarez
as 2:2023cv02455
Petitioner:
Ricky D Hollins
Respondent:
Unknown Monarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Luckenbill v. Peters
as 2:2023cv02462
Petitioner:
Steven Luckenbill
Defendant:
Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Halterman #289633 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2023cv08615
Petitioner:
Jerad Lee Halterman
Respondent:
Ryan F Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duke #060858 v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08616
Petitioner:
Brent Fitzgerald Duke
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Office of the Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benjamin-Hernandez v. Unknown Party
as 4:2023cv00541
Petitioner:
Edilio Benjamin-Hernandez
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Billingsley
as 2:2023cv02439
Petitioner:
Bruce Henry Smith
Respondent:
James Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lopez v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00534
Petitioner:
Raul Lopez
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kachina v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00531
Petitioner:
Gary Allen Kachina
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
