Cases 141 - 150 of 6,067
JANDREW v. ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv00901
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. JANDREW
Defendant:
ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, ROWAN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS, RYAN BARKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Hoffman
as 5:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Joseph Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. Miller et al
as 1:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Grant Paul Dalton
Defendant:
Quentin Miller, Alex Allman, Vivian Bacote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOTHARP v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS
as 1:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
ZANNIE JAY LOTHARP
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Pearson v. Barker
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pearson
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornett v. Asheville Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Cornett, Sr.
Defendant:
Asheville Police Department, City of Asheville and Buncombe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Revis v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Revis
Defendant:
Tracey Buchanan, Steve Davis and Hailey Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Schuller
as 3:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Iesha C Murphy
Defendant:
FNU Schuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Carolyn Jarvis, Michelle Shook, Robyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Le Maitre v. Parker et al
as 5:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Wendell J. Le Maitre and Wendell Jude Le Maitre
Defendant:
FNU Parker, FNU Boyd, FNU Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
