Cases 71 - 80 of 1,093
STORMBORN TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. MEDICAL GUARDIAN LLC
as 2:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
STORMBORN TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant:
MEDICAL GUARDIAN LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Wagman Metal Products, Inc. v. Concria OY
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Wagman Metal Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Concria OY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORP. et al v. TESTO, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORP. and PARKER INTANGIBLES, LLC
Defendant:
TESTO, INC., TESTO SE & CO. KGaA and TESTO NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
CONTEGO SPA DESIGNS, INC. v. MR SPA INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
CONTEGO SPA DESIGNS, INC.
Defendant:
MR SPA INC. and S3 SPA INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BETA-CALCO, INC. v. CAMMAN LIGHTING, INC.
as 2:2021cv01864
Plaintiff:
BETA-CALCO, INC.
Defendant:
CAMMAN LIGHTING, INC. doing business as CAMMAN LIGHTING
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
OPEX CORPORATION v. INVATA, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv05575
Plaintiff:
OPEX CORPORATION
Defendant:
INVATA, LLC and HC ROBOTICS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION v. KRYO, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01724
Plaintiff:
THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Defendant:
KRYO, INC. and EBB THERAPEUTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. BASLER, INC.
as 2:2021cv05160
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
BASLER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BUCKINGHAM MANUFACTURING CO., INC. v. BASHLIN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2021cv01390
Plaintiff:
BUCKINGHAM MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
Defendant:
BASHLIN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MCS Industries Inc. v. ALDI INC.
as 2:2021cv03828
Plaintiff:
MCS Industries Inc.
Defendant:
ALDI INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
