Cases 11 - 20 of 240,213
H. v. G6 Hospitality LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Catelyn H.
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality LLC, Wyndham Hotel & Resorts, Inc., Las Vegas Sands Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sandoval et al v. Bosley et al
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sandoval, Samuel Herrera, Arthur Martinez and others
Defendant:
John Bosley, Bosley Management, Inc, Santa Clara Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wool & Oak, Inc. v. Container Number WHSU6916907 et al
as 2:2024cv04164
Plaintiff:
Wool & Oak, Inc.
Defendant:
Container Number WHSU6916907 and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1701 Shipping/Maritime
Ramirez v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ramirez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Douse v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
James Nathaniel Douse
Defendant:
United States of America and Greylock McKinnon Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gibas v. Houghton
as 1:2024mc00008
Petitioner:
Susan Marie Gibas
Respondent:
Keith J. Houghton
Ridge Wallet LLC, The v. 2985 LLC
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Ridge Wallet LLC, The
Defendant:
2985, LLC doing business as Mountain Voyage Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Unfair Competition (Lanham Act)
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union-Industry Pension Fund et al v. SCSA Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04080
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union-Industry Pension Fund, John A. Wagner and Anthony M. Perrone
Defendant:
SCSA Group, Inc. doing business as SCSA/South Coast Safe Access
Matthews v. PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2024cv21894
Plaintiff:
Ana Matthews
Defendant:
PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
