Cases 101 - 110 of 18,987
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00863
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12217
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gino v. Voytovick et al
as 1:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Angela Gino
Defendant:
Nathanial Voytovick and New Buffalo, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Patronik v. Pieske et al
as 1:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lynn Patronik
Defendant:
Todd Swanker, Norton Shores, City of and Ryan Pieske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Holzhausen et al v. Stickell et al
as 1:2024cv12209
Defendant:
Daniel Stickell, Zachary Smith, Sloan Kowalewsky and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Holzhausen and Charles Holzhausen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ELG et al v. King et al
as 2:2024cv12195
Defendant:
John Doe, Universal Protection Services Doing business as Allied Universal Security Services Doing business as Allied Universal Security Services, LLC and Kenneth King
Plaintiff:
ELG and Latoreya Till
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
