Cases 111 - 120 of 17,560
Williams v. Google LLC (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Google LLC doing business as Youtube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Reaves et al v. City of Auburn et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Bianca Reaves and Kathy R. Williams
Defendant:
City of Auburn, City of Auburn Police Department, Cedric Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glenn v. ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Qiana Glenn
Defendant:
ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Glenn v. ATR Auto Transport & Recovery (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Qiana Glenn
Defendant:
ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henderson v. Pettway
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Betty Henderson
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Pettway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mcelroy v. The Bibb County Health Care Authority
as 7:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Astrid Mcelroy
Defendant:
The Bibb County Health Care Authority doing business as Bibb Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
