Cases 151 - 160 of 12,337
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Vaughn v. Performance Labs, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Defendant:
Kiersten Lamar, Performance Labs, LLC, Spring Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Tiffany M. Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peet v. Sikeston, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00136
Defendant:
James McMillen, Tyler Rowe, Stewart's Auto Sales, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Audrea Rachelle Peet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00990
Defendant:
Carol Ingram, Geraldine Williams and CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI
Plaintiff:
Ashley Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Seals-Supalus v. Russell et al
as 4:2024cv00982
Defendant:
The M.S. of A., Inc. Home Office and Joyce Russell
Plaintiff:
King Solomon Seals-Supalus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
