Cases 31 - 40 of 18,666
Gibbs v. Ottawa County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
John Gibbs
Defendant:
Ottawa County Board of Commissioners and Joe Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Le v. Hartford, City of, et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Hai Quoc Le, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Hartford, Tressa Beltran and Hartford, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beck et al v. Montcalm, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Beck, Patrick Beck, Serrina Bowser and others
Defendant:
Montcalm, County of and Joanne Vukin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bosma v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv11405
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Bosma
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and MDHHS Genesee Co Union St District
West v. Unknown Party
as 1:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
William Troy West
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hicks v. Van Houten
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Albert Himer Hicks, Jr
Defendant:
Margaret M. Van Houten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Duby v. Barkley et al
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Ariane Jeanine Duby
Defendant:
Todd Vernon Barkley, Scott B. Hodshire, Hillsdale County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
